Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
jbates99
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
396 Posts |
Posted - 2014-01-17 : 11:57:45
|
I'm looking into the 2012 feature, AlwaysOn.My instance for data warehouses will be 2012. However the source instances are 2008 R2. I'm assuming that I can't use AlwaysOn to keep my warehouses refreshed with current data from the production databases, is that correct?Currently I use snapshot replication to update the warehouse twice a day but I'm looking for an option that gives more real-time data.Thanks, Jack |
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2014-01-17 : 12:59:36
|
AlwaysOn isn't a solution for a data warehouse, but especially since you have 2012 and 2008 R2. The AlwaysOn databases will be SQL Server 2012 mirrored databases. So you can't have any schema changes like you would with a data warehouse. What you get with AlwaysOn is an identical database either real-time (synchronous) or with some latency (async).Tara KizerSQL Server MVP since 2007http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
jbates99
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
396 Posts |
Posted - 2014-01-17 : 13:14:21
|
Thanks, Tara. That's as I expected. Can you suggest a better technique than using snapshot replication which is what I have been using? |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2014-01-17 : 13:24:17
|
How about transactional replication? That's what I used in the past for our reporting instance. We did switch to AlwaysOn when we upgraded to SQL Server 2012, but it's because our reporting database had the exact same structure.Tara KizerSQL Server MVP since 2007http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
|
|
|