Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
AskSQLTeam
Ask SQLTeam Question
0 Posts |
Posted - 2000-10-16 : 18:39:06
|
| Suraj writes "<Table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr> <td>I need your help regarding this tough SQL query my colleague has asked me to solve.</td></tr><tr> <td>Table: Tempo</td></tr><tr> <td>Fields: AccessID(int), DependentID(int)</td></tr><tr> <td>Tempo has the following rows.</td></tr><tr> <td><table border =1><tr> <td> AccessID </td> <td> DependentID </td></tr><tr> <td> 1 </td> <td> 2 </td></tr><tr> <td> 2 </td> <td> 3 </td></tr><tr> <td> 3 </td> <td> 4 </td></tr><tr> <td> 4 </td> <td> 5 </td></tr><tr> <td> 5 </td> <td> 6 </td></tr><tr> <td> 6 </td> <td> 7 </td></tr></table></tr> </td><tr> <td>The query is to return me records for a given Accessid going all </tr> </td><tr> <td>the way to the root. For example: for AccessID = 4, the records </tr> </td><tr> <td>returned should be:</tr> </td><tr> <td><table border=1><tr> <td> AccessID </td> <td> DependentID </td></tr><tr> <td> 4 </td> <td> 5 </td></tr><tr> <td> 3 </td> <td> 4 </td></tr><tr> <td> 2 </td> <td> 3 </td></tr><tr> <td> 1 </td> <td> 2 </td></tr></table></tr> </td><tr> <td>since, '4' is a dependent on '3', and '3' is dependent on '2', </tr> </td><tr> <td>and '2' is depdendent on '1' ... or in other words</tr> </td><tr> <td>1 --> 2 --> 3 --> 4 etc. So for Access ID = 4, the path should </tr> </td><tr> <td>be retraced 4 --> 3 --> 2 --> 1.</tr> </td><tr> <td>We are using SQL Server 6.5 and would be upgrading to 7, running </tr> </td><tr> <td>on Windows NT workstation (Service pack 6a).</tr> </td><tr> <td>Thanks</tr> </td></table>" |
|
|
|
|
|