Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
AskSQLTeam
Ask SQLTeam Question
0 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-21 : 08:41:52
|
| Praveen writes "Hi, I am using SQL server 2000. In one my of stored procedure, I am inserting records in a table which has 42 fields and data type for most of the fields are varchar. The data is taken by using JOIN on 5 tables. I am commiting transaction in loop for minimum use of tempdb. Total 1400000 records are inserting in this table. This procedure takes more than 24 hour on server which has 1 GB RAM and i processor. But it can not completes in this time also and sometimes gives error "tempdb full". But it is working fine on server which has 3GB RAM and 4 processors, it executes within 30 minutes. Whats problem?. Please help me." |
|
|
Seventhnight
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
2878 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-21 : 10:22:25
|
| why are you putting 1.4 million records into a temp table?And you wonder what the difference is when you quadruple the processors and triple the RAM... really?!?Problem: Too much work for your slower computer...Solution: Get a more powerful 2nd computer OR Fix your stored procedure so that it runs as efficiently as possible (probably not a 1.4 mil record temp table...)Corey |
 |
|
|
clarkbaker1964
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
428 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-21 : 17:06:58
|
| Can you use a Cursor to filter the where clause for your insert...Thinking you may be able to do a Select Distinct from some field that would section the data into different commit points.iedeclare @ProductID VarChar(255)declare c1 cursor FAST_FORWARD for select Distinct Productid From Productopen c1fetch next from c1 into @ProductIDwhile @@fetch_status = 0 beginBegin Tran insert into CustomerProduct select * from Product p Inner Join Customer c On p.ProductId = c.ProductID where p.ProductId = @ProductID if @@error <> 0 begin Rollback tran raiserror('Failed to create product customer data.',16, 1) return -1 end Else Begin Commit Tran End fetch next from c1 into @ProductIDendclose c1deallocate c1Surf On Dude! |
 |
|
|
jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
4110 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-21 : 23:23:50
|
| is it possible to use updatable views? |
 |
|
|
clarkbaker1964
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
428 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-22 : 12:59:42
|
| Could you expand on that...Surf On Dude! |
 |
|
|
jen
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
4110 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-22 : 22:52:11
|
from BOLquote: Updatable ViewsMicrosoft SQL Server 2000 enhances the class of updatable views in two ways: INSTEAD OF Triggers: INSTEAD OF triggers can be created on a view in order to make a view updatable. The INSTEAD OF trigger is executed instead of the data modification statement on which the trigger is defined. This trigger allows the user to specify the set of actions that need to take place in order to process the data modification statement. Thus, if an INSTEAD OF trigger exists for a view on a given data modification statement (INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE), the corresponding view is updatable through that statement. For more information about INSTEAD OF triggers, see Designing INSTEAD OF triggers.Partitioned Views: If the view is of a specified form called 'partitioned view,' the view is updatable, subject to certain restrictions. Partitioned views and their updatability are discussed later in this topic. When needed, SQL Server will distinguish Local Partitioned Views as the views in which all participating tables and the view are on the same SQL Server, and Distributed Partitioned Views as the views in which at least one of the tables in the view resides on a different (remote) server.If a view does not have INSTEAD OF triggers, or if it is not a partitioned view, then it is updatable only if the following conditions are satisfied: The select_statement has no aggregate functions in the select list and does not contain the TOP, GROUP BY, UNION (unless the view is a partitioned view as described later in this topic), or DISTINCT clauses. Aggregate functions can be used in a subquery in the FROM clause as long as the values returned by the functions are not modified. For more information, see Aggregate Functions.select_statement has no derived columns in the select list. Derived columns are result set columns formed by anything other than a simple column expression, such as using functions or addition or subtraction operators.The FROM clause in the select_statement references at least one table. select_statement must have more than non-tabular expressions, which are expressions not derived from a table. For example, this view is not updatable: CREATE VIEW NoTable ASSELECT GETDATE() AS CurrentDate, @@LANGUAGE AS CurrentLanguage, CURRENT_USER AS CurrentUserINSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements also must meet certain qualifications before they can reference a view that is updatable, as specified in the conditions above. UPDATE and INSERT statements can reference a view only if the view is updatable and the UPDATE or INSERT statement is written so that it modifies data in only one of the base tables referenced in the FROM clause of the view. A DELETE statement can reference an updatable view only if the view references exactly one table in its FROM clause.
|
 |
|
|
GunZ
Starting Member
29 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-23 : 00:25:39
|
quote: Originally posted by AskSQLTeam Praveen writes "Hi, ... Total 1400000 records are inserting in this table. This procedure takes more than 24 hour on server which has 1 GB RAM and i processor. But it can not completes in this time also and sometimes gives error "tempdb full". But it is working fine on server which has 3GB RAM and 4 processors, it executes within 30 minutes. Whats problem?. Please help me."
me thinks server with 1 GB RAM and i processor has less disk space than server with has 3GB RAM and 4 processors as the former compalains of "tempdb full".But, I could be rong...Australia.NSW.Sydney.GunZ |
 |
|
|
clarkbaker1964
Constraint Violating Yak Guru
428 Posts |
Posted - 2004-09-23 : 17:50:26
|
| Hi again...I was the one that told you you could use a cursor... Learned something along the way and thought I would post a revised solution and try to wipe the Mud off my face.Declare @ProjectID Char(6), @sSql as nVarChar(1000)If Exists(Select Top 1 * from #ProjectID)Drop Table #ProjectID--CREATE YOUR TEMP TABLE WITH DISTINCT VALUES--MAKE IT SMALL YOU ONLY NEED THE VALUE.Select Distinct Project_Id Into #ProjectID From ProjectWhile Exists(Select Top 1 * from #ProjectId)BEGIN --GET THE FIRST VALUE Select Top 1 @ProjectID = Project_Id from #ProjectId --RUN THE INSERT BASED ON A WHERE CLAUSE FROM THE MATCHING ID'S Set @sSql = 'Select * Into ResultsTable from PL Where Project_Id = ''' + @ProjectID + '''' Exec sp_ExecuteSql @sSql --REMOVE THE ID FROM THE TEMP TABLE AND LOOP FOR NEXT VALUE Set @sSql = 'Delete from #ProjectId Where Project_Id =''' + @ProjectID + '''' Exec sp_ExecuteSql @sSqlEND --while--THANK YOU ALL FOR THE GREAT FEED BACK I SEE IN THESE FORMSSurf On Dude! |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|