Author |
Topic |
bandersnatcher
Starting Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-24 : 08:30:49
|
Hello I am having a bit of a fun time at the moment I am currently trying to set up a clustered sql environment and have hit a snag at the moment. The physical set up is all done on good dell kit that has been checked out by a dell engineer who is happy with the set up, I set up the hardware as a clustered environment and then installed sql server 2000 ent and sp4 afterwards. The virtual server itself can see all of the drives through my computer but within the enterprise manager it will only see the drive that the data base is on even though you can force it by typing in the full destination to create a manual backup on one of the drives it cannot see. Anyone got an idea what this is about. thank you in advance |
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-24 : 12:54:50
|
Are the drives setup in Cluster Administrator and the SQL Server service is dependent upon those drives?Tara Kizerhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
rmiao
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
7266 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-24 : 13:56:52
|
And they should be in same group with sql resources. |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-24 : 14:02:00
|
Well that's what I said. You can't have a dependency exist outside of the cluster resource.Tara Kizerhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
bandersnatcher
Starting Member
3 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 04:31:13
|
Does this mean that the directory will not be visable unless it is made dependant on the sql service ? (Sorry I can't take the server offline to check at the moment or I would just try it ) |
|
|
rmiao
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
7266 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 11:09:16
|
Yes. |
|
|
eyechart
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
3575 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 12:08:36
|
this is normal.we use UNC paths for backups to get around these types of issues.-ec |
|
|
rmiao
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
7266 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 15:31:24
|
Not normal if you want to put db files on it. |
|
|
eyechart
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
3575 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 15:49:40
|
quote: Originally posted by rmiao Not normal if you want to put db files on it.
this is normal for cluster install. read the first post, the OP is not trying to put datafiles on these drives.-ec |
|
|
rmiao
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
7266 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 15:56:59
|
Installation only adds one disk as sql dependency resource to put on system dbs, have to add other disks manually if don't want to put all users dbs on same disk with system dbs. |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 16:21:04
|
rmiao, you are missing ec's point.Tara Kizerhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
rmiao
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
7266 Posts |
Posted - 2007-07-25 : 16:40:59
|
Got it. |
|
|
seethem
Starting Member
46 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 17:03:18
|
quote: Originally posted by eyechart this is normal.we use UNC paths for backups to get around these types of issues.-ec
How do you do this? |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 17:41:00
|
UNC path:BACKUP DATABASE DbNameTO DISK = '\\SomeRemoteServer\SomeShare\SomeBackupFile.BAK'Tara KizerMicrosoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Serverhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
seethem
Starting Member
46 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 20:44:53
|
quote: Originally posted by tkizer UNC path:BACKUP DATABASE DbNameTO DISK = '\\SomeRemoteServer\SomeShare\SomeBackupFile.BAK'Tara KizerMicrosoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Serverhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/
Hi Tara,Thanks for the response, here is going a step further....Suppose I wanted to have all of my databases off of a 2-node cluster backup to a shared file-system. Additionally, I want this file-system to be highly available. Do I then create a new resource group with an I.P. address and have that new resource group highly available and then add the shared disk to this new resource group and then use the UNC paths to do backups.Thanks... Regards,seethem |
|
|
tkizer
Almighty SQL Goddess
38200 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 20:52:29
|
Wouldn't the shared file system be configured as a new drive and that drive be added as a dependency to the SQL Server cluster group?Tara KizerMicrosoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Serverhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ |
|
|
seethem
Starting Member
46 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 21:18:15
|
quote: Originally posted by tkizer Wouldn't the shared file system be configured as a new drive and that drive be added as a dependency to the SQL Server cluster group?Tara KizerMicrosoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Serverhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/
Hi Tara,I don't think I would want to do that. I have several instances on both nodes. The truth is that my nodes are in an active/active configuration.I want to have one large LUN for the backups...That is why I want it in a highly available start.Thanks and regards,seethemRegards,seethem |
|
|
eyechart
Master Smack Fu Yak Hacker
3575 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-22 : 21:40:10
|
you wouldn't have to give this new drive a distinct name or IP address. You could simply add this drive to one of your current SQL cluster groups. You would then setup a share in the cluster admin tool on this new shared drive. accessing it would be simple, just UNC to the SQL virtual host name + sharename.-ec |
|
|
seethem
Starting Member
46 Posts |
Posted - 2007-08-23 : 14:26:40
|
quote: Originally posted by eyechart you wouldn't have to give this new drive a distinct name or IP address. You could simply add this drive to one of your current SQL cluster groups. You would then setup a share in the cluster admin tool on this new shared drive. accessing it would be simple, just UNC to the SQL virtual host name + sharename.-ec
Isn't it cleaner to do it the way I suggested? I don't know. You all are the gurus. |
|
|
|