Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
Author |
Topic |
mledesma
Starting Member
2 Posts |
Posted - 2015-04-24 : 10:41:56
|
Hello forum,I'm trying to sum by the tender type. Below is the current and wanted results along with my script. I am a novice with SQL....Thank you,MikeCurrent RESULTS:STORE_NO WORKSTATION_NO RTL_TRN_ID TENDER_TYPE_ID GROSS_SALES GROSS_RETURNS9921 1 7400 1 -0.02 0.000000009921 1 7400 1 30.00 0.000000009921 1 7401 5 21.98 0.000000009921 1 7402 5 9.98 0.000000009921 1 7404 1 20.00 0.000000009921 1 7404 5 4.98 0.00000000Wanted RESULTS:STORE_NO WORKSTATION_NO RTL_TRN_ID TENDER_TYPE_ID GROSS_SALES GROSS_RETURNS9921 1 7400 1 29.98 0.000000009921 1 7401 5 21.98 0.000000009921 1 7402 5 9.98 0.000000009921 1 7404 1 20.00 0.000000009921 1 7404 5 4.98 0.00000000 select RT.STORE_NO, RT.WORKSTATION_NO, LI.RTL_TRN_ID, TI.TENDER_TYPE_ID, TI.TENDER_AMOUNT as GROSS_SALES, sum ( case when (LI.RETURN_FLG=1) then (LI.QUANTITY) * (LI.PLU_PRICE) else 0 end ) as GROSS_RETURNS from RTL_TRN_DEV RT left join SALE_RTRN_LN_ITEM as LI on (RT.RTL_TRN_ID=LI.RTL_TRN_ID) and (RT.STORE_NO=LI.STORE_NO) right join TENDER_LINE_ITEM as TI on (TI.RTL_TRN_ID=LI.RTL_TRN_ID) and (TI.STORE_NO=LI.STORE_NO) where LI.VOID_FLG = 0 and LI.MRCH_ITEM_FLG = 1 group by RT.WORKSTATION_NO, RT.STORE_NO, LI.RTL_TRN_ID, TI.TENDER_TYPE_ID, TI.TENDER_AMOUNT |
|
Ifor
Aged Yak Warrior
700 Posts |
Posted - 2015-04-24 : 12:21:21
|
SUM(TI.TENDER_AMOUNT) and remove TI.TENDER_AMOUNT from the GROUP BY.Also your outer JOINs should probably just be JOINs.The WHERE clause already converts the LEFT JOIN to a JOIN and the outer part of the RIGHT JOIN looks pointless. |
|
|
mledesma
Starting Member
2 Posts |
Posted - 2015-04-27 : 13:59:44
|
quote: Originally posted by Ifor SUM(TI.TENDER_AMOUNT) and remove TI.TENDER_AMOUNT from the GROUP BY.Also your outer JOINs should probably just be JOINs.The WHERE clause already converts the LEFT JOIN to a JOIN and the outer part of the RIGHT JOIN looks pointless.
I made the changes and understand what you are saying. Thank you very much!Mike |
|
|
|
|
|